A lawyer friend took me to lunch last week. It is not mandatory to wear a mask either in the street or in a restaurant, but we were amused to find that we had to wear a mask to pass through one doorway to get from one to the other. The door led straight from the street into the eating area. No-one could explain the purpose of the notice, but of course, complying with it was mandatory.
Let’s ignore the facts about masks, that they serve no purpose as they cannot prevent viruses from passing through as viruses are so small, but concentrate on something far more worrying.
The following day we were stopped from entering an area of wasteland in Lagos because we were required to wear a mask to pass through the gate.
“What gate?” I asked.
We were told in all seriousness that there was a gate across a twenty yard stretch of land. I could see no gate, neither could my companions, but the idiots in front of us insisted there was a gate, and we had to wear a mask to pass through it.
Things quickly got worse. They explained that we had to wear a mask to enter a covered area. “What cover?” we asked. “What’s that up there?”
No-one answered. It was, of course, the sky, the sun, and an occasional wisp of cloud. Certainly no covering could be seen, and there was nothing to support any kind of roof as there were no walls.
It got worse. We were told there was a barrier dividing off the refreshment area. No-one could see any barrier. We were told the barrier was a line across the ground which we couldn’t see. Apparently this barrier was there to keep the viruses from crossing into the restaurant area.
No-one could tell us where the notices were alerting the viruses of the existence of this barrier which was to prevent them crossing into another area of the open waste land.
All this nonsense despite the well known fact that viruses cant survive in open sunlight for more than two minutes. But then, who reads the science papers on these subjects?
This is serious. Grown people claiming the sky is a roof and so a patch of waste land is covered, and that there are gates and barriers which none of us can see. I always understood that people who have hallucinations need medical treatment. Is this the desired result of this whole covid nonsense? If not, can someone tell me in plain but scientific language what this is all about. At least in the sixties when we saw non-existent roofs and gates it was because we were high on LSD.
What is this lot high on? And can they ever come down from this weird trip? The whole incident was more like the entry into a lunatic asylum.
dr john clare,
By Email
I live in Finland where the "mask mandate" is only a mandate in name. No legal mandate to wear a mask, I can freely not use one and go everywhere. But it is all even worse, because majority still wear them and some even frown at people not wearing them. It makes it all the more insane to see the insanity and know it is all voluntary insanity, just because they believe in a lie without anyone even having to scare them with a fine. They fear a disease that has actually reduced the over all complications of respiratory infections in Finland by making the mildly ill people not circulate to catch the more harmful influenza viruses and such that were more common before this relatively harmless new corona. I guess if the hospital systems in different parts of the world would be in as good shape as before the "pandemic" and people were not insane as they are, covid alone would have reduced deaths all over the world like it has done in Finland.
By K. Lehto from Other on 01 Oct 2021, 14:48
I cannot believe that you would publish an article that is anti-mask. This 'dr clare' says : "Let’s ignore the facts about masks, that they serve no purpose as they cannot prevent viruses from passing through as viruses are so small...." however masks have been proved effective in reducing the transmission of airborne respiratory diseases, including COVID-19. This is irresponsible.
By Mark Laedlein from Beiras on 01 Oct 2021, 18:49
So true!!Good article????????
By DorisK. from Lisbon on 01 Oct 2021, 21:19
May I suggest that the learned Doctor (of what?) should read today´s issue of Bloomberg Prognosis : How effective are cloth masks.? He may then appreiate more definitively the efficiency levels claimed for both cloth and surgical masks and the desirability of their continued use in situations which may vary from location to location and from person to person .
Robert Cavaleiro (Sr.) de Tomar
By Cavaleiro Roberto from Other on 03 Oct 2021, 13:12
"however masks have been proved effective in reducing the transmission of airborne respiratory diseases" Mark Laedlein, this is a misconception. There have been no scientific findings that prove such a thing. There have only been a few defrauded papers published pointing to such a theoretical possibility but they have not been peer reviewed and have since been widely disqualified in scientific circles. They have only taken a life of their own among the covid-cultists. There are in fact hundreds of studies to prove masks are either not effective or only harmful. In the past there have been even laws passed, in my recollection for instance in France, to forbid the marketing of protective masks against respiratory diseases like corona viruses, because there were detected a push to fear-monger and push for masks by vested interests in big pharma.
By K. Lehto from Other on 03 Oct 2021, 20:07
Why the indignation over being told to don a mask?You have a choice: use the facility or not. If the owner of a facility demands a mask you can comply or not enter. You have no right of entry in to a privately owned business. Indignation and incredulity will not change the situation, only a drop in customer numbers might prompt a rethink on their part.
By Ian from Lisbon on 19 Oct 2021, 12:12