According to Executive Digest, Francisco Calheiros, president of the Portuguese Tourism Confederation (CTP), expressed great concern about this scenario and warns that the national tourism industry will not be able to withstand such a long wait for the new infrastructure.
“I think it will take 20 years and Portuguese tourism cannot survive 20 years without an airport,” Francisco Calheiros told Lusa, highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the actual location of the future airport. The Alcochete Shooting Range was the option officially announced by the Government, but political instability and the change in the Executive raise doubts about the viability of this plan.
The uncertainty surrounding the formation of the next Portuguese government is also raising concerns in the sector. Francisco Calheiros highlights that a potential Socialist Party (PS) government would have a different approach to a government led by the Social Democratic Party (PSD), and even within the latter, there is no guarantee that politicians would maintain their current plans.
“We will have a new government. If it is from the PS, it will be completely different. If it is from the PSD, we do not know if the ministers will be the same”, added the leader of the CTP, reflecting the widespread concern about the continuity of the decision regarding the location of the new airport.
Despite the political uncertainty, Pedro Nuno Santos, secretary general of the PS and former Minister of Infrastructure, recently assured, in an interview with CMTV, that if he is elected Prime Minister he will maintain the choice of Alcochete as the location of the airport.
NA – Aeroportos de Portugal, the concessionaire of the Vinci group responsible for the national airport infrastructure, estimates that the new airport could be operational by mid-2037. However, the company admits that, with optimizations to the schedule to be negotiated with the Government, the infrastructure could be inaugurated at the end of 2036.
The Portuguese Tourism Confederation fears that the lack of definition and bureaucratic processes will further delay the planned schedule. With the current Executive in charge, negotiations with ANA are at a standstill, which increases the sector's concern. “The halt in negotiations with the concessionaire will only worsen the problem and generate even more uncertainty”, warned Francisco Calheiros.
Crazy idea, instead of wasting taxpayer money for a few to get rich, there's already a built airport in Beja that is not being fully used. It's a lot cheaper to improve what already exists, just build a high speed train to Lisbon. People have no idea how much time and money it'll take them to get to Alcochete if they don't change the accessibility current plans. Yet again we are veing played fools
By nunof from Lisbon on 25 Mar 2025, 11:16
I am not worried about the tourist industry , there are enough tourist, ask the people living in Lisbon. It is a shame that notting is happen with new hospitals, for sure that is boycotted by , LA LUZ and CUF and there share holders. This already for more than 30 years.
By martien van dorsser from Alentejo on 26 Mar 2025, 07:57
my favorite alternative is the flat land north of Marateca. There you have 2 highway options, the A2 and A12. In addition, a high speed train connection via the 25th april bridge could easily be realized.
By Nick from Lisbon on 26 Mar 2025, 18:18
Improving & Expanding the Faro airport would also help alleviate some Lisbon traffic:
Expand Terminal Capacity:
Faro Airport's terminal currently processes around 24 flights and 2,400 passengers per hour, with plans to increase this to 30 flights and 3,000 passengers per hour over the next few years. Accelerating this expansion—potentially adding more check-in desks (currently 60), boarding gates (currently 36), and aircraft stands (currently 22)—could boost capacity further. A second terminal could be considered if passenger numbers consistently exceed 10 million annually.
Extend Runway Length:
The single runway (28/10) limits the size of aircraft that can operate efficiently. Extending it could allow larger wide-body planes (e.g., Boeing 787s or Airbus A350s) to serve long-haul international routes, such as to North America or Asia, reducing reliance on smaller aircraft like the Boeing 737s and Airbus A320s currently dominant.
Improve Ground Transport Links:
Enhanced connectivity to Faro city (4 km away) and the broader Algarve region could support higher passenger volumes. A rail link—studied in 2018 but not yet implemented—between the airport and Faro’s railway station (5.7 km away) would ease road congestion and attract more international travelers. Upgrading the N125-10 road and increasing bus frequency (currently operated by Próximo) could also help.
By az2pt from Algarve on 29 Mar 2025, 20:18